Easyboot Glue-On Removal

I pulled a couple Easyboot Glue-On shells off one of my horses last night. The hoof boots were applied using Vettec Adhere and Vettec Equi-Pak CS. CS is used to pack the sole area, provide cushioning and prevent thrush.

The shells have been in place for roughly 8 days and have been through a bunch of sand and some water. The photos illustrate what a successful install should look like and how the CS fills the sole cavity. 

Comments

[Susan Gill]

Hi Garrett - Could you feel any difference in the movement and / or comfort of the horse after using the CS to pack out the soles, compared to previous glueings when the Adhere was used alone?
And also any comparisons between CS and pads for comfort?
cheers, Susan :)

[Garrett Ford]

Susan- I really can't tell a big difference. I can see a bit of difference on hard roads but not a big deal. I actually think the CS does a bit more than the comfort pads.

Garrett Ford

[Susan Gill]

Hi Garrett, I find it interesting that the CS might be better then the comfort pads. IT would certainly be more stable, therefore less likely to cause any movement to the boot which ultimately might result in the adhesion weakening. Although the strength of the bond as seen in the videos etc. looks exceptional!
I've just checked out the vettec website and have the next question for you: did you do any testing with the vettec anti-shock goo, or just the CS version because it's helpful against thrush developing while the boots are glued on for quite a long time? The CS sounds "nice" - is it like a firm jelly consistency?
cheers - Susan :)

[Garrett Ford]

Susan- I'm not familiar with the Vettec anti-shock goo? Is that an Aussi term or a new product?

I believe the biggest plus is that the hoof isn't elevated in the boot when Equi-Pak is used. I personally don't like elevating the foot at all if possible.

They do make a Equi-Pak without the CS. I have yet to try the non CS version but I believe it's the same product without the thrush protection of the copper sulfate. The non CS version would be a good choice in areas without thrush and moisture problems.

Hope that helps.

Garrett Ford

[Susan Gill]

Hi Garrett - yes/no "anti shock goo" could probably be considered as my personal wording because I'd flipped off the website and didn't remember accurately...correct term is Equi-Pak
Instant Shock Absorbent Hoof Packing.
So you were right about the product, it was just the term "Instant Shock Absorbent" that caught my interest. If it is the same goo, without the CS, but just worded differently for marketing, then yes CS version sounds much better to use.
Susan:)